Plants and Us - the shared genetic heritage between long separated cousins!
We as a species find it very easy to identify with other
animals and we are adept at imagining anthropomorphic qualities in them but we
seldom feel the same with plants. In this book ‘What a Plant knows’, Daniel Chamovitz examines how plants see,
feel, hear, smell and remember and shows us that the genetics underpinnings are
the same as us, though they took a different evolutionary path in the last one
billion years.
Starting with Darwin’s contribution in the study of plants
(it is amazing how much a single man has
contributed to the field of evolutionary biology), Daniel looks at the
different ‘senses’ from a plant’s point of view, the role of the various genes
and how they have evolved to create the huge diversity in the plant kingdom that we see
today. The best thing about the book is the way Daniel defines the fundamentals
of each ‘sense’, how we humans use that sense and how it differs when it comes
to the realm of plants.
Maybe not as eloquent as Richard Dawkins or as technically
deep as Nick Lane, Daniel Chamovitz brings a different style of science writing
that I found fascinating. Explaining the concepts in a very clear and simple
manner, while not dumbing it down, Dainiel has done a remarkable job. Though the book is on plants, I found its
coverage of genomics (from the basics to the complex) one of the best that I
have seen. (Never seen a better one line definition of ‘Epigenetics’).
We take plants for granted and see them basically as food
for us. Though we acknowledge their
greenery, beauty and other contributions to making earth a habitable place, we
still never take them as seriously as we
would consider animals or birds. However any one who read this book will start looking at plants differently.
From the carnivorous venus fly trap to the stately oak tree, we will start
admiring the innovations that our cousins have come up with using the same
genetic code that we share with them.
Don’t miss this book – it will enhance your senses!
2 comments:
"Maybe not as eloquent as Richard Dawkins or as technically deep as Nick Lane, Daniel Chamovitz brings a different style of science writing that I found fascinating." I'll accept this critique any day! Thanks very much for the thoughtful review! It is encouraging to get feedback that lets me know that what I had intended for the book was indeed conveyed.
Danny Chamovitz
Hi Danny,
Your book has come out really well. Do keep writing!
Rgds,
Sam
Post a Comment